The article seems to concentrate deeply on energy issues rather he could also point out other factors that could help to stop climate change, because it’s not only energy that do impact the climate change. And his brief example of energy uses by humans are too broad, instead I think he must pick specific reasons of which energy do impact the climate change, and how this could really impact like daily life and our future, instead of just putting information that using fuel, coal or oil is bad. Moreover, his explanation was written such a short paragraph; it is hard to persuade other people who could have different point of view. Climate issues gives such a broad controversial, I think the author must pay attention on how to attract others to believe this point is right. Also when the author pointed out on how U.S and China must put into action, but in my belief, U.S words has so much of “let’s change the world” but they never put this into action. What change have U.S made to impact other country? I think it’s not U.S and China must act first, rather every nation must make a way to work cooperatively on this climate change issue. Plus, action plays louder than words, U.S should not just wait other to work cooperatively, if U.S may act first this could lead other nations to follow this actions.
No comments:
Post a Comment